Image courtesy of pexels

Is the PR procurement process fit for purpose?

I have recently been involved in the procurement process for a membership organisation wanting to find a new PR provider.

I found the procurement process a real eye-opener and it has made me think about how organisations go about choosing PR support and wondering if there can / should be guidance to ensure both sides – supplier and client – get the most out of the process.

I did not win this particular contract, but this post is not as a result of any bad feeling or sense of injustice as I was not treated any differently to the other PR providers in the procurement process.

I will not name names – that is not the point of this post – but I hope it will prompt debate / responses from others on their experience.

The Pitch Catwalk

As an Independent PR Practitioner I am generally invited to a meeting with one or two people from the (potential) client. I may be given a brief in advance which we discuss at the meeting, but usually we discuss what the business / organisation needs and I how I can help them.  On a few occasions I have been asked back for a follow-up meeting, but generally the decision on who to engage is made after one meeting. As an Independent PR Practitioner I have never experienced a catwalk before – this being when a number of PR people are paraded in front of a panel – this is more usual for PR agencies to experience.

Before I attend the first meeting, I always send a creds document and direct them to my website to read case studies and testimonials as well as get a feel of who I am, what I do, etc. I include a link to my site – specific to them – so I can monitor if they have visited my site as part of their research.

My most recent experience started off well. I was sent a brief (well, nine bullet points of tactics) to which I was asked to advise of my costs and the way in which I work with clients. I made it very clear that I am an Independent PR Practitioner.

I was shortlisted and invited to a meeting with the CEO and Membership & Communications Manager. We had a really positive session and I reiterated that I am an Independent Practitioner and call in extra resources as required – I only work with members of the CIPR and CIM, and preferably Chartered members. I was told that a shortlist of three would be selected who would be asked to meet Board members and given a scenario to present to them.

I was delighted to be called back as one of the final three. So far so good.  However, from my perspective, this is where the procurement process went downhill.

The Procurement Process

The problem is – and it may just be in this case – that there was no apparent appreciation on the part of the (prospective) client of the time required to prepare for the catwalk. They asked for a presentation to nine people on one of three scenarios plus a response to a crisis situation (which they provided detail of). These and background information on me and my company needed to be fitted into a 40 minute presentation, leaving time for a Q&A.

As an Independent Practitioner I do not have a business development team who can pull the information together, so the time I spent preparing for the catwalk was at the expense of working on paid client work. My decision, I know, but I spent three solid days working out a feasible strategy for the scenario, plus the crisis situation, creating a presentation and printing and binding it as a leave-behind and belt-and-braces in case technology failed me.

Included in this document and my presentation was the fact I am an Independent Practitioner and it was evident that while I have a lot of experience working with membership organisations, I have not worked in their sector before.

This three days was on top of the whole day I was out of the office as the presentation was in the Midlands (and I am based in Surrey) – oh, plus the cost of the train fare (they did fortunately give me enough notice that I was able to get a cheap fare). Whether I was awarded the contract or not, I still devoted four days of time to this prospect – that’s four days I did not get paid for. Well, five days actually as the first meeting was a three hour round trip with a nearly two hour meeting, plus my prep time.

Jump to the end, and I received an email to tell me that I had not been successful. When I pressed for feedback, the response made my blood boil – not because I was not selected (as I am pretty philosophical about this), but because the reason I was given meant I stood absolutely no chance of being selected as I am the polar opposite of who they chose.

This is where the lack of appreciation comes in – or perhaps it is a lack of understanding – of what is involved in what they asked to be presented to the Board. The feedback I received was: “Whilst the panel felt you had a strong background, it was purely a question as to whether it would be a risk working with a one-person team. The appointed team have knowledge of a lot of the regulation and technology for our sector.”

If they were going to choose an agency with sector experience, why ask me – an Independent Practitioner with no sector knowledge but oodles of membership knowledge and experience? Did they make their decision difficult by having to compare apples and pears, or did they make it easier by asking me there to convince themselves they really did want an agency?

I have chalked this one up to experience and will make sure that I ask far more questions about what a prospective client is looking for in future – and will not dwell (too much) on the five days of income this particular organisation has lost me.

What’s the solution? Is there one?

A large agency has more manpower to devote to such a time-intensive procurement process. A small agency – or independent – just suffers loss of income.

Would guidance on the procurement process – a type of best practice in procurement guide – help?  The CIPR published a procurement toolkit back in 2006 – but perhaps this could be updated. What do you think?

When I ran an in-house PR team I never put suppliers through this time-consuming catwalk. I would give a brief to two or three providers (being upfront about the number of companies being contacted) and invite each of them to an informal meeting asking them to give me an indication of what they would do for me, plus clients to contact for references. I would most likely make a decision after this stage. Job done. I failed then, and still do, to see how asking for presentations on strategy involving lengthy time commitments in preparation, will make the decision easier for me.

Is there a solution or potential for best practice guidance on the procurement process to be updated to help alleviate the huge amount of time pretty-much wasted on pitch catwalks?

Image courtesy of pexels

Read Original Post

Lindsey Collumbell

Consultancy & strategic PR solutions for membership organisations. Chartered PR Practitioner. CIPR Board and Council member plus Chair of the Professional Development and Membership Committee.

Posted in Editor's Picks, Public Relations
One comment on “Is the PR procurement process fit for purpose?
  1. Jack Irvine says:

    Procurement has become an industry in itself and sadly its practitioners know very little about how the PR business works. I always find it amusing that one’s diversity policy often counts more than industry experience.

    I have seen incredible examples of corruption over the years. I expect poor Lindsey Collumbell was in the final three to make up the numbers. the decision had probably been taken long before.

    Years ago I gave up trying to get on the Scottish Government’s procurement panel. The second time we tried we were informed we didn’t have enough experience. This was laughable as our business had been going then for about 15 years, had handled major crises all over the world and, as well as having the cream of political, IR, philosophy and languages graduates on our team, we also had three former senior journalists including two editors. It was abundantly clear that if a PR firm had been hired to oppose a government policy (Labour were in power at the time) then there was no chance of getting on the procurement panel.

    That was when I decided it was easier to work for Governments outwith the UK, all of whom took the pragmatic approach of hiring the best people for the job and to hell with procurement bureaucracy.

    Just to get surreal though I was approached by a major Sottish government agency after we had been rejected by the panel and they begged us to get them out of a very big hole. They even told us what competitors were bidding and how we could undercut them. I told them to get stuffed not because of my high moral standpoint but because the fees were pathetic.

    Procurement rules are bent all the time so in answer to Lindsey’s question, the process is not fit for purpose and I would posit that rather than the process ensuring a level playing field we are now in a morass of bureaucracy and political point scoring. As Lindsey is a sole practitioner ( I think) whose time management is critical, she would be well advised to stay well away from the procurement swamp.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *