Join CIPR
A couple sit cuddling on the sofa while watching television. The man on the left is Asian and wears a vest and short. He is holding a remote control. The man on the right is white with a shaved head and dark beard. He wears a t-shirt and jeans.
Library image: SrdjanPav / iStock
PUBLIC RELATIONS
Monday 12th February 2024

Thinking inside the box: broadcast TV strikes back

Why ITV’s ratings-winner Mr Bates vs the Post Office shows broadcast TV’s days are far from being numbered

On 25 December last year, the BBC’s long-running soap EastEnders attracted an audience of 3.6 million people.  

No small number. But when it’s pointed out that the highest-rated episode of EastEnders is the Christmas Day 1986 episode, which attracted over 30 million viewers, it does help illustrate a wider trend – that television has been on something of a decline these past few decades.  

The reason? Well, consumers today have so many other options: Netflix, Apple TV+, Disney+, Facebook, TikTok… Long gone are the days of four channels. Thanks to the internet, consumers are no longer beheld to the decisions of scheduling editors at national broadcasters. They can watch what they want, when they want, and how they want. And with such plurality of choice, ‘must-see’ watches that dominate water-cooler conversations are increasingly rare.   

But this year there has been a notable exception to that trend. ITV’s Mr Bates vs the Post Office gained a reaction unlike any other I have ever seen off the back of a television drama. The four-part series tells the story of a long-running campaign to expose the Horizon IT system scandal. Hundreds of Post Office staff were wrongfully accused of theft and fraud. 

Of course, television can and does bring the country together, from nail-biting World Cup finals to the recent funeral of our late Queen. But these are live events. Rarely does a drama series become the focus for national attention and political discourse. 

But Mr Bates vs The Post Office incontrovertibly achieved just that. Since the series aired on ITV (and was made available on ITVX) last month, Mr Bates vs the Post Office has become ITV’s biggest new drama in over a decade; the first episode was watched by 10.9 million viewers. It even beat the launch of sumptuous period drama Downton Abbey  in 2010.

Aside from being a ratings hit, the drama reignited the campaign for justice for the 700 postmasters wrongly accused of fraud.  

Since the drama aired, the Post Office scandal has been the main national topic of conversation. It has dominated front page news, trended on all social media platforms, occupied hours of broadcast media, and effected real change. Ex-Post Office boss Paula Vennells bowed to the 1.2 million-strong petition on Charge.org and handed back her CBE. Other petitions calling for compensation for Post Office victims and a knighthood for campaigner Alan Bates are in the works.  

But here’s the thing: the Post Office scandal is one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British history. But it’s not a new story. The scandal has been covered extensively for years. It has been the subject of news reports on television, in-depth feature articles in newspapers, and countless articles online.  

Yet it took a television drama to make the story real and evoke a scale of empathy to light the spark of a mass movement calling for social change. 

Using Emotional Storytelling

It all comes down to emotional storytelling. If the Brexit campaign taught us anything, it’s that when it comes to communicating a narrative, it’s not about the facts, it’s about the feelings. It’s not about the maths, it’s about the mood. For Mr Bates’s campaign to truly resonate with a public audience, facts and figures alone couldn’t convey the scale of the scandal. People needed to see the human stories behind the headlines.    

Some 17 years since Netflix announced it would start streaming and the first iPhone was introduced to the world, “The death of TV” has been predicted as imminent, with many social commentators and journalists writing-off television and its impact on society. In fact, just last November, The Spectator’s Zoe Strimpel wrote that ‘menus today yield a never-ending parade of untempting trash’ in an article fittingly named The Death of TV.  

Yes, TV has changed with the main national broadcasters no longer dominating an evening’s viewing options in the way they once did. But let’s not write-off television just yet. As Mr Bates has found out, it is, sometimes, a first-class way to deliver a message.  

Will Richardson is associate director at global marketing agency Team Lewis.